"If General McClellan--oops, McKiernan--does not want to use the army, I would like to borrow it for a time."

Not to get into the whole "Who won the debate?" thing (except that, unfortunately, Palin had clearly won the debate about halfway through, so I gave up in despair and went to clip my toenails), but one would think that Afghanistan, fer chrissakes, is prominent enough on our national radar that you would bother getting the stuff right.

I know, I know: we've only been at war there for seven years. Some might say that this is not long enough to figure out who's who and what's what. If you're running for vice president, however, you might want to give it a shot:

Sarah Palin gets wrong both the commanding general in Afghanistan's name and position.The commanding general in Afghanistan didn't merely state that Surge tactics won't work! He also said that tribal involvement in the COIN strategy wouldn't work either! Absolutely right on infrastructure in Afghanistan though! Know what they really need in Afghanistan to enhance security? ROADS.

Palin thinks our commander in Afghanistan is someone named "McClellan." It is, I believe, McKiernan. And Palin is DEAD WRONG. He absolutely said that tribal involvement in Afghanistan COIN strategy would not work.

McKiernan: "I do think there's a role for traditional tribal authorities and tribal structure in Afghanistan, in the rural areas especially, to play in a community-based sense of security, of connection with the government, and of environmental considerations. But I think that has to be led, that tribal engagement, it has to be led by the Afghan government. I specifically tell my chain of command in ISAF [International Security Assistance Force, the name for NATO's mission in Afghanistan] that I don't want the military to be engaging the tribes to do that. It has to be through the Afghan government to do that. But of course, there's danger in that. There's always, "Is this particular tribe, is it being reached out to for all the right reasons?" That has to be watched very closely."

McKiernan: "First of all, please don't think that I'm saying there's no room for tribal engagement in Afghanistan, because I think it's very necessary. But I think it's much more complex environment of tribal linkages, and intertribal complexity than there is in Iraq. It's not as simple as taking the Sunni Awakening and doing the Pashtun Awakening in Afghanistan. It's much more complex than that."

It's a damned good thing that McClellan isn't our general in Afghanistan; Lincoln isn't around to send him dryly sarcastic notes before ultimately tossing him out on his butt for incompetence.

Remember when Lincoln flew in his jetpack around the battlefield at Gettysburg before leaving to help fight the Nazis in the Philippines?

In re: history as useful myth, Biden tried to conjure the ghost of FDR as a lesson on leadership during the current financial meltdown. Unfortunately, nearly every single historical fact he cited in his talk was incorrect:

Joe Biden’s denunciation of his own campaign’s ad to Katie Couric got so much attention last night that another odd note in the interview slipped by.

He was speaking about the role of the White House in a financial crisis.

“When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed,” Biden told Couric. “He said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’”

How ignorant is this statement? Let me count the ways:

1. Franklin Roosevelt didn’t become president in 1929 during the crash. He won the 1932 election and took office in 1933, largely because of the 1929 crash and the incompetent protectionist policies that transformed it into a Great Depression.
2. If FDR and President Herbert Hoover didn’t talk about the “princes of greed” in 1929, by the time FDR took over, that kind of populist rhetoric had certainly taken root. FDR greatly escalated the scope of federal government to institute the kind of redistributionism that Obama and Biden now champion.
3. If Hoover or FDR appeared on television in 1929 or even 1933, only a few hundred people would have seen it. Television was still an experimental medium and wouldn’t be introduced to the public for at least another decade.

Certainly there's a point to be made here by ringing in FDR; just get it right, buddy, will you?

Who's on first; What's on second.

One of the things we're hoping is that our president knows the names of the major world leaders he has to deal with on a daily basis. Not knowing that Johannes Adam Ferdinand Alois Josef Maria Marko d'Aviano Pius von und zu Liechtenstein is the Sovereign Prince of Liechtenstein is one thing; not knowing who's running Pakistan is quite another.

At the first of the 2008 Presidential debates, it seems that McCain had a little trouble keeping the players straight without a scorecard:

Democrats picking over the remains of the debate are not only pleased to find that John McCain didn’t mention the middle class, but he had surprising number of foreign policy slips.

The one that leapt out was McCain, kinda like George Bush in 2000, getting the name of Pakistan’s president wrong. (Bush didn’t know it.)

“Now, the new president of Pakistan, Qadari (it’s actually Asif Ali Zardari), has got his hands full,” McCain said.

He also said, “I don’t think that Sen. Obama understands that there was a failed state in Pakistan when Musharraf came to power,” referring to former President Pervez Musharraf, who took power in a coup 1999. Although Pakistan sure had problems, many people didn’t regard the country, then a nuclear-armed one, as a failed state.

McCain also stumbled over pronouncing such things as Ahmadinejad and Taliban, and as we noted last night, he confused Iran’s Revolutionary Guard with Iraq’s Republican Guard, prompting Obama to make the same error.

He also seemed a bit off on his history, when he declared that Eisenhower wrote two letters before leading the Normandy invasion on D-Day, with one offering his resignation. Actually, Ike offered to accept responsibility.

The Eisenhower thing you can almost understand--as a society we often find history more useful as myth than as fact, and we frequently make allowances for that--but when these unforced errors begin to pile up, you wonder whether a candidate has the requisite knowledge to function on a day-to-day basis.